Troponin in COVID-19: To Measure or Not to Measure? Insights from a Prospective Cohort Study.

Myocardial injury (MI), defined by troponin elevation, has been associated with increased mortality and adverse outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but the role of this biomarker as a risk predictor remains unclear. Data from adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were recorded prospectively. A multiple logistic regression model was used to quantify associations of all variables with in-hospital mortality, including the calculation of odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CI). Troponin measurement was performed in 1476 of 4628 included patients, and MI was detected in 353 patients, with a prevalence of 23.9%; [95% CI, 21.8-26.1%]. The total in-hospital mortality rate was 10.9% [95% CI, 9.8-12.0%]. The mortality was much higher among patients with MI than among those without MI, with a prevalence of 22.7% [95% CI, 18.5-27.3%] vs. 5.5% [95% CI, 4.3-7.0%] and increased with each troponin level. After adjustment for age and comorbidities, the model revealed that the mortality risk was greater for patients with MI [OR = 2.99; 95% CI, 2.06-4.36%], and for those who did not undergo troponin measurement [OR = 2.2; 95% CI, 1.62-2.97%], compared to those without MI. Our data support the role of troponin as an important risk predictor for these patients, capable of discriminating between those with a low or increased mortality rate. In addition, our findings suggest that this biomarker has a remarkable negative predictive value in COVID-19.

Effect of Discontinuing vs Continuing Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers on Days Alive and Out of the Hospital in Patients Admitted With COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: It is unknown whether angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have a positive, neutral, or negative effect on clinical outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Objective: To determine whether discontinuation compared with continuation of ACEIs or ARBs changed the number of days alive and out of the hospital through 30 days. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized clinical trial of 659 patients hospitalized in Brazil with mild to moderate COVID-19 who were taking ACEIs or ARBs prior to hospitalization (enrolled: April 9-June 26, 2020; final follow-up: July 26, 2020). Interventions: Discontinuation (n = 334) or continuation (n = 325) of ACEIs or ARBs. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the number of days alive and out of the hospital through 30 days. Secondary outcomes included death, cardiovascular death, and COVID-19 progression. Results: Among 659 patients, the median age was 55.1 years (interquartile range [IQR], 46.1-65.0 years), 14.7% were aged 70 years or older, 40.4% were women, and 100% completed the trial. The median time from symptom onset to hospital admission was 6 days (IQR, 4-9 days) and 27.2% of patients had an oxygen saturation of less than 94% of room air at baseline. In terms of clinical severity, 57.1% of patients were considered mild at hospital admission and 42.9% were considered moderate. There was no significant difference in the number of days alive and out of the hospital in patients in the discontinuation group (mean, 21.9 days [SD, 8 days]) vs patients in the continuation group (mean, 22.9 days [SD, 7.1 days]) and the mean ratio was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.90-1.01). There also was no statistically significant difference in death (2.7% for the discontinuation group vs 2.8% for the continuation group; odds ratio [OR], 0.97 [95% CI, 0.38-2.52]), cardiovascular death (0.6% vs 0.3%, respectively; OR, 1.95 [95% CI, 0.19-42.12]), or COVID-19 progression (38.3% vs 32.3%; OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 0.95-1.80]). The most common adverse events were respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (9.6% in the discontinuation group vs 7.7% in the continuation group), shock requiring vasopressors (8.4% vs 7.1%, respectively), acute myocardial infarction (7.5% vs 4.6%), new or worsening heart failure (4.2% vs 4.9%), and acute kidney failure requiring hemodialysis (3.3% vs 2.8%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients hospitalized with mild to moderate COVID-19 and who were taking ACEIs or ARBs before hospital admission, there was no significant difference in the mean number of days alive and out of the hospital for those assigned to discontinue vs continue these medications. These findings do not support routinely discontinuing ACEIs or ARBs among patients hospitalized with mild to moderate COVID-19 if there is an indication for treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04364893.

L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway and oxidative stress in plasma and platelets of patients with pre-eclampsia.

Pre-eclampsia (PE), a syndrome of pregnancy-induced hypertension, continues to be a leading cause of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate whether changes in oxidative status are correlated with alterations in the L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway and platelet aggregation in PE. Plasma and platelets from women with PE (n=24) or normotensive pregnancy (NP, n=27) recruited in the third trimester of gestation were used to measure oxidative damage assessed by protein carbonyl content, antioxidant activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and nitrite levels. Transport of L-[(3)H]-arginine, as well as the activities of the nitric oxide (NO) synthase (eNOS and inducible NO synthase (iNOS)) and platelet aggregation, were also evaluated. Plasma nitrite levels and the activities of SOD and CAT were reduced in PE (5.2±2.7, 3.4±0.8, 0.3±0.4, respectively, P<0.05) compared with NP (8.7±2.3, 6.7±3.1, 1.0±0.5, respectively), whereas protein carbonyl content and L-arginine levels were not significantly different between PE and NP groups. In platelets, L-arginine transport was reduced in PE (19.2±10.5, P<0.05) compared with NP (62.0±31.1), whereas the NOS activity, eNOS and iNOS expression, nitrite levels and platelet aggregation were unaffected. Protein carbonyl content was increased, and CAT activity was reduced in platelets from PE (0.03±0.02, 0.55±0.30, respectively, P<0.05), compared with NP (0.005±0.005, 1.01±0.36, respectively). The data suggest that a systemic impairment of antioxidant defense mechanisms is associated with decreased plasma nitrite levels, which may contribute to hypertension in PE. Oxidative stress may contribute to the reduced influx of L-arginine in platelets. Compensatory mechanisms may contribute to the maintenance of NO production and its modulatory role on platelet function.

Desempenho funcional de crianças com paralisia cerebral diparéticas e hemiparéicas / Functional performance of children with cerebral palsy diplegia and hemiplegia

Na Paralisia Cerebral (PC), o ideal é associar o desempenho funcional com características topográficas e alterações de tônus. Entretanto, grande parte da bibliografia descreve apenas a doença e suas conseqüências, e, quando se avalia o desempenho funcional, não se consideram as diferenças existentes nos tipos de PC ou se utiliza apenas um tipo. Na literatura, foi encontrada apenas uma referência bibliográfica que diferencia diparéticos e hemiparéticos quanto ao seu autocuidado, e nenhuma que compare a mobilidade entre eles. Este trabalho teve por objetivo avaliar a relação do desempenho funcional de crianças com PC diparéticas e hemiparéticas. Para tanto, fez-se um estudo transversal com portadores de PC diparéticos e hemiparéticos espásticos, de ambos os sexos, de três a sete anos, que estavam realizando fisioterapia. Excluíram-se crianças que não andavam e (ou) com déficit cognitivo. Foram realizadas entrevistas com cuidadores, utilizando-se a parte 1 (desempenho funcional nas áreas de autocuidado e mobilidade) do Inventário de Avaliação Pediátrica de Incapacidade (PEDI), assim como um questionário com dados pessoais das crianças. Utilizou-se programa BioEstat 4.0, e o teste estatístico Mann-Whitney, para verificação da associação proposta. Aceitou-se α  0,05 como inferência estatística. A amostra foi composta de 40 crianças, 22 diparéticas e 18 hemiparéticas. A maioria era do sexo feminino (53 por cento) e realizava tratamento associado à fisioterapia (88 por cento). A área de autocuidado (p=0,16) não apresentou diferença entre os grupos. Todavia mobilidade, (p=0,02) sugere que o grupo hemiparético possui melhor desempenho funcional. Concluiu-se que os hemiparéticos possuem melhor mobilidade que os diparéticos, enquanto que, no autocuidado, não se observou diferença estatística entre os grupos.